Photo from unsplash

Originally Posted On: How to Choose the Right Leadership Style for Your Team (2020exchange.com.au)

 

Congratulations: you’re the leader. Whether you’re a CEO, CFO, business owner, managing director, etc, you’ve proven that you possess abilities as the leader of people.

But how much do you know about leadership style?

The harsh truth is, that though many leaders are good leaders, a lack of communication with their employees means that their leadership ability never gets the chance to shine. While you might be the right leader, if you don’t have the right leadership style, you might never get to show it.

So how can you fix it? What can you do if you think your style of leading might not be connecting with your employees?

Thankfully, there’s an answer. This article will walk you through the different leadership styles, so you can figure out the one that’s right for you.

DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE

Many people associate the word “democratic” today with the American political party, but the word has a long, storied, philosophical history. Democracy was the style of leadership advocated by John Locke that inspired — in large part — the American government.

A Democratic form of leadership is an egalitarian style of leadership, where each employee is given a certain amount of autonomy. A democratic leader gives up some of their power to weigh the options and feelings of each member of the team.

To many leaders, this may seem weak at first — but there’s more to it than meets the eye. A leader who consults their team has a higher chance of making their employees feel appreciated, and employees who feel appreciated, do more work. They also have less of a chance of leaving you and going to a competitor.

The Democratic style also gives the leader the advantage of letting the workers — who are down in the field — figure out what’s best for them. Multiple heads are better than one — there’s no way you can know what’s best for every single individual — so why not let every man be an island and take care of themselves?

Working as more controlling, the autocratic leader may get things done quicker at first, but employees under a democratic leadership will learn to develop autonomy and get work done faster. They’ll also be more likely to gain the skills required to be a leader under you.

AN EXAMPLE

This style is not one for push-overs, it’s one for negotiators, and one of the best types of leadership styles around. Warren Buffet is famous for his laissez-faire style of leadership, where he leaves employees to their own devices.

This makes a great deal of sense for someone in the laissez-faire capitalist system of Warren Buffet. Buffet is someone who’s benefited a lot from the free-market economy, he understands that giving people handouts isn’t the solution, if everyone fends for themself, more people raise to the top.

The democratic leadership style works on the old saw: give a man a fish (or tell him exactly what to do), you feed him for a day, teach a man to fish (give him autonomy), you feed him for a lifetime. Consider feeding your company for a lifetime by employing a democratic leadership style.

AUTOCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE

The Autocrat — in contrast — is someone who hordes all of the power for themself. The Autocrat may take into consideration how employees feel for particular decisions, but it’s not a focus.

Autocratic leadership was advocated for by philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli. He believed that to get things done, a leader has to operate an attitude that “the ends justified the means”.

If you’re in a crunch for time, money, or are in a position where you know the most about your product and process, authoritarian leadership can be best for you. Authoritarian leaders work best in times of crisis and peril because there’s simply no time to dilly dally and consider everybody’s feelings about every single issue.

To outsiders, this style of leadership can seem harsh. However, an autocrat doesn’t need to be tyrannical or abusive. They just make sure that they keep an eye on employees, to make sure that they’re doing their job right.

AN EXAMPLE

A great example of an autocratic leader was film director Stanley Kubrick. Kubrick was famously a perfectionist and didn’t listen to the advice of anyone when making a film. Many directors choose to work closely with actors to figure out what should happen in a scene — not Kubrick; he famously filmed take after take until he got what he wanted.

The autocratic leadership style relies on the adage “too many cooks in the kitchen spoil the broth”. If you’re worried you have too many cooks in the kitchen, improve your broth by taking charge and becoming an autocratic leader.

While autocratic leadership is good during a time crunch — like a big project, film, or time of crisis, it’s generally a style that’s only good for short periods.

COACHING LEADERSHIP STYLE

The coaching leadership style is less of a leadership style, and more of a way to do your style, a tactic of sorts.

Coaching leaders are generally leaders who have experience in their field. They provide hands-on experience and get to know their employees one-on-one to develop their skills.

A coaching leader in a democratic leadership style would allow the employees to choose their way and show them how to get it done. A coaching leader in an autocratic style would make the final decisions about what happens but walk employees through how to get it done right.

DEVELOP YOUR LEADERSHIP STYLE

It’s not easy to lead a team of workers in today’s economy. Thankfully, if you figure out which leadership style is best for you, you can increase your productivity and in turn increase profit.

Consider if you would benefit more from an autocratic style or democratic style and if that style could be augmented by coaching leadership.

For more information, contact us today.